Search for: "State v. N. S."
Results 121 - 140
of 20,449
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2024, 3:00 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:30 pm
Facts and legal background 2.1 Facts An air passenger suffered a delay in the transport of his baggage on a flight from Madrid (Spain) to Cancún (Mexico). [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:19 am
Since 1804, the Supreme Court’s decision in Murray v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 12:09 pm
United States (Bankruptcy Discharge; McGirt v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:57 am
Earlier this year, the Fourth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
” Petrella, 572 U.S. at 670 n.4. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Defendant was established within the Department of State and tasked with "administering, enforcing, and interpreting New York state's ethics and lobbying laws" (Executive Law § 94 [1] [a]), including Public Officers Law §§ 73, 73-a, 74; Legislative Law art 1-A; and Civil Service Law § 107. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Defendant was established within the Department of State and tasked with "administering, enforcing, and interpreting New York state's ethics and lobbying laws" (Executive Law § 94 [1] [a]), including Public Officers Law §§ 73, 73-a, 74; Legislative Law art 1-A; and Civil Service Law § 107. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:15 am
In keeping with the FCC’s forbearance from requiring BIAS providers to contribute to the federal Universal Service Fund, Footnote 1,476 provides, “we maintain the status quo with respect to states’ ability to impose state-level contribution obligations on the provision of BIAS for state universal service programs. [read post]
13 May 2024, 5:58 pm
By Jeffrey N. [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:42 pm
S. 224, 239, n. 17 (1988). [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:36 am
LinkedIn Corp., 31 F.4th 1180, 1186 n.4 (9th Cir. 2022) (hereinafter “hiQ 2022 Circuit opinion”); see also hiQ Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am
Canada On 7 May 2024, the Court of Appeal for British Columbia dismissed the appeal in Simán v Eisenbrandt, 2024 BCCA 176 (CanLII). [read post]
12 May 2024, 1:42 pm
LUV N CARE, LTD., Appellant, v. [read post]
11 May 2024, 10:09 am
This money judgment, however, only states that a party must pay a particular sum. [read post]
11 May 2024, 7:42 am
As Florida’s Fifth District Court of Appeal explained in King v. [read post]
11 May 2024, 6:56 am
The third focuses cognitive control of target populations of competitor or target states (and other collectives) connected to "cold war. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:31 am
Music producer Sherman Nealy initiated what would become Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
