Search for: "State v. Necessary"
Results 121 - 140
of 35,843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2015, 7:46 am
The post State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 10:56 am
This form of interconstitutionalism plays an important role in Moore v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 6:59 am
State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 11:17 am
The post State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:48 am
The Ninth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:29 am
R (Binyan Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (2) [2008] EWHC 2100 (Admin); [2008] WLR (D) 300 “In performing the necessary balancing exercise in relation to public interest immunity and the exercise of the court's discretion to order disclosure, it was incumbent on the court to have regard to the absence of a relevant consideration in the PII certificate and schedule, namely, in the light of the allegations made by the… [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 5:40 am
See Salazar, 750 F.3d at 520 (stating that “the prevailing petitioner is presumptively entitled to necessary costs”) The Court noted that the term “clearly inappropriate” is not used in any other fee-shifting statute. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 6:03 am
See Salazar, 750 F.3d at 520 (stating that “the prevailing petitioner is presumptively entitled to necessary costs”) The Court noted that the term “clearly inappropriate” is not used in any other fee-shifting statute. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
SeeEisner v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
On June 16, 2020, the First Circuit released its opinion in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 8:21 am
In X (South Yorkshire) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 2954 (Admin), the Divisional Court declared that the Guidance was unlawful insofar as it did not require the decision maker to consider whether to invite the subject to make representations. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 12:42 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 10:41 am
In order to keep his position on various medical association boards and continue interacting with the State Legislative Affairs Committee on medical issues, it was necessary to have his conviction set aside. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:03 am
CAAF’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:47 pm
In light of United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 1:15 am
The post Case Preview: R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for the Home Department appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:23 am
’” State v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:23 am
’” State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 10:33 am
Lochner v. [read post]
