Search for: "State v. Personnel Housing" Results 121 - 140 of 1,075
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2022, 4:29 am by Emma Snell
The memo from Gilbert Cisneros, the defense undersecretary for personnel, is an attempt to give troops the same benefits regardless of where they are stationed, now that 13 states have moved to ban abortion after Friday’s reversal of Roe v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 5:36 am by Bernard Bell
 The operator had to allow NMFS and Coast Guard fisheries enforcement personnel to access the information. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:54 am by Dan Lopez
So that became a tool of control in terms of your personnel, either you could push somebody out of the program or you could demote them, or you could threaten them if they were not in line. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 8:50 am by Tess Bridgeman
” In addressing the American people, he explained that IS posed a threat to “American citizens, personnel and facilities” in Iraq, Syria, and “the broader Middle East,” but also admitted that no plotting had been detected against U.S. territory. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Teresa Chen, Alana Nance, Han-ah Sumner
” In a similar vein, a document leaked on Twitter at the end of March revealed that China and the Solomon Islands may be on the verge of signing a security agreement that would allow the Solomon Islands to call upon the Chinese government to provide military and law enforcement personnel to maintain “social order” in exchange for China’s ability to use the archipelagic state for “logistical replenishment,” “stopover” and… [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by Phil Dixon
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 5:01 am by Etta Lanum
By 1981, the Supreme Court was reviewing a sex discrimination case titled Rostker v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 12:14 pm by Rebecca Plevel
  She also ruled against the South Carolina State Election Commission in striking down a witness requirement for absentee voting during the height of the pandemic, in Middleton v. [read post]