Search for: "State v. Piper"
Results 121 - 140
of 335
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2017, 3:59 am
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615; see Putnam County Temple & Jewish Ctr., Inc. v Rhinebeck Sav. [read post]
23 May 2018, 3:59 am
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [2015]; see Putnam County Temple & Jewish Ctr., Inc. v Rhinebeck Sav. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:44 am
” Briefly: At ACSblog, Piper Hoffman argues that the Supreme Court should deny certiorari in Dukes v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 8:12 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Jace Piper v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:37 am
The CJEU stated that the system of the InfoSoc Directive is one of broad and preventative rights. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 6:17 pm
Lee v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 4:48 am
In fact, this guidance may very well have been issued as a result of those actions, particularly SEC v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 3:10 pm
Zuckerberg) Formerly Sealed Complaint (U.S. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 3:10 pm
Zuckerberg) Formerly Sealed Complaint (U.S. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 5:12 am
" The plaintiffs are represented by John Reed with DLA Piper [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 2:34 pm
Thanks to techno.pal Browning Marean from DLA Piper for this tip - it’s saved me, as well as hundreds of my clients, a significant amount of time. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 6:42 am
Please continue reading below for the text of DLA Piper's follow-up Client Alert posted by John Reed and Jennifer Lloyd.In Gatz Properties LLC v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm
Hong Kong The DLA Piper Privacy Matters Blog has covered developments in Hong Kong’s data protection regime. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 12:24 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am
On 15 December 2023, as stated above, Fancourt J handed down judgement in favour of the claimants in the case of The Duke of Sussex and Ors v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3217 (Ch). [read post]
12 May 2008, 11:26 am
David Donoghue of DLA Piper in his Chicago IP Litigation Blog [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 1:45 am
Ofcom stated that the financial penalty was issued due to the “seriousness and repeated nature of this breach,” and will require the broadcaster to publish a statement of its findings on a date determined by the regulator. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:25 am
Additionally, plaintiff’s section 487 cause of action lacks the requisite particularity (see CPLR 3016 [b]; Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 28 NY3d 903 [2016]). [read post]
