Search for: "State v. Potter Company" Results 121 - 140 of 199
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2018, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
On 30 January 2018 the Court of Appeal gave the claimant permission to appeal in the case of Butt v Secretary of State for Home Department. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:33 am by Myron Orfield
” Conservatives like Romney, Dirksen, Burger, Potter Stewart, and Harry Blackmun supported the Brown v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Forty-five years ago, the baseball world trained its attention on the Wisconsin Supreme Court and its impending decision in the case of Wisconsin v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
” This overbroad formulation is a far cry from the definition set forth by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 11:13 pm by Marie Louise
TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of DEALER FINANCIAL SERVICES over DEALERS FINANCE COMPANY (TTABlog)   US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Lamborghini – Lamborghini launches trademark infringement lawsuit over Dal Toro logo: Lamborghini v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:41 am
  Teva (and a merry band of other generic companies) argued that the '894 Patent did not protect this combination product under Article 3(a) of the SPC Regulation. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak)   United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak)   United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
' Court of Appeal rules... - Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 4:31 am by Broc Romanek
Delaware Chancery Court's Groundbreaking Decision: "Brokers" as Recordholders Here is some news from John Grossbauer of Potter Anderson: Last Tuesday, Delaware Vice Chancellor Laster delivered a potentially important opinion in Kurz v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IP finance), MARQUES international advertising portal goes live: (Class 46)   Global - Patents Using patent landscaping analytics to improve the quality of M & A decisions: a review of Cox Enterprises’ $300M purchase of Adify: (IP Asset Maximiser Blog), Universities reap royalty rewards; investors ignore IP at their peril: (IAM), Top IP-owning nations claim faster patent processing; near harmonisation deal: (Intellectual Property Watch), Bosch, Xerox and Dupont sign up… [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am by Kelly
XX v HMRC (IP finance) United States US Patents  ‘Sub-standard’ patents cost the US economy over $25 billion a year. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(Spicy IP) Israel English version of Israel patent database available (The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office gears up for filing online (The IP Factor) Adjudicator of IP rules AMERICAN APPAREL lacks distinguishing features (The IP Factor) ‘Ein Gedi’ not acceptable as a word mark (The IP Factor) Japan Japan starts new patent prosecution highways with Austrian Patent Office and IP Office of Singapore (Managing Intellectual Property) Libya Libya cuts trade mark filing… [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
” That leaves any potential censorship based on the ridiculous standard which Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart advanced for pornography in the case of Jacobellis v. [read post]