Search for: "State v. Pounds"
Results 121 - 140
of 3,053
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2011, 2:11 am
In the case of W v Veolia Environmental Services (UK) PLC [2011] EWHC 2020 (QB), Judge Mackie QC was asked to consider the validity of a claim for damages. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 7:42 am
US v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 6:46 am
Here is a policy interpretation case from the United States Fifth Circuit. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 11:04 am
Alba-Flores drives eight pounds of meth into San Ysidro and is caught. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 9:30 am
We draw particular attention to two: Malik v Dacre (Editor of the Daily Mail Newspaper) – disposed of on 13 January 2016 Malik v High Court of Justice Queen’s Bench Division, awaiting a judicial decision on the papers. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 8:45 am
Young v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:00 am
The defendant relied on the judgment of Lord Dyson in the Supreme Court case of R (Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2012] 1 AC 245 [101]), in which he disapproved the concept of “vindicatory damages”. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 7:56 am
Guidry v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 8:12 am
I shall write about two of them on this blog next week: United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 5:58 am
In 2009, Mr Dill removed and arranged for the sale of the urns at auction, which sold for £55,000. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 6:38 am
Nothing on today’s order list about this 800-pound-gorilla of election cases. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:34 am
As stated in North v North [2007] EWCA Civ 760 he ‘is not an insurer against all hazards’. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 1:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 8:58 am
Reece v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 7:26 am
In particular, Hacon HHJ stated: “I do not take the view that it is incumbent upon an SME to prove exhaustively that it cannot access loans from elsewhere to fund litigation” (at [14]). [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 4:07 am
Christopher Niebel v Information Commissioner – 14 October 2013 We have just succeeded in an appeal to the Information Rights Tribunal against a fine of £300,000 issued by the Information Commissioner against one of our clients for a breach of the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR). [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 9:34 am
He borrowed £6,500 (£7,450 when the fee was included). [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 4:07 pm
He attached real importance to the form of the letter, stating that it made no judicial application (i.e. to adjourn the hearing or set aside the service) and did not carry a statement of truth. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 8:00 am
Morris v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 4:00 pm
In the recent case of Batts v. [read post]
