Search for: "State v. Purcell" Results 121 - 140 of 173
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2020, 3:33 am by Edith Roberts
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Jasper Tran and Cameron Baker write that Allen v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 6:03 am by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for state and local officials in Arizona v. [read post]
” He stated that the Purcell principle required the court to stay the injunction with respect to 2022 elections and if the lower court’s judgment was affirmed after appellate review, the injunction would take effect for congressional elections after 2022. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
United States The New York Law Journal reports that a libel claim filed [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 2:22 pm
  The plea by Ohio authorities relies heavily upon thoe Supreme Court’s per curiam ruling two years ago in Purcell v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 11:28 am by John Elwood
” (relisted after the September 26, October 7, and October 14 conferences)   Purcell v. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 12:51 pm by John Elwood
The court granted that stay in May, citing the Purcell principle – the idea that courts should not make changes too close to the election. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 2:32 am by Lyle Denniston
  In doing so, the Fifth Circuit panel relied heavily on a 2006 Supreme Court decision cautioning courts not to put changes in voting laws into effect close to election day (Purcell v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:43 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the September 26 and October 7 conferences)   Purcell v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
            Ed Purcell most fully (and movingly) captures this thought. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 4:16 am
Colo. 2008) (alleged "direct violation of the Code of Federal Regulations" too general to state violation), Heisner v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 9:32 am by John Elwood
And on Monday, the court denied review to the state of Ohio’s petition in five-time relist Shoop v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 9:03 pm by Bryn Hines
The guidance, issued in the aftermath of the Dobbs v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm by John Elwood
” The petitioners in each of the five relisted cases – Purcell v. [read post]