Search for: "State v. R. V. B."
Results 121 - 140
of 15,485
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2018, 5:39 pm
TunneyThe case of R. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 10:13 am
P. 72(b)(3); see Marji v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
R (Lumsdon & Ors) v Legal Services Board [2015] UKSC 41, 24 June 2015 (see judgment). [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:58 pm
§ 1400(b), "refers only to the State of incorporation" of the alleged infringer. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 1:12 pm
See R-S-C v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 2:43 am
Q (Somalia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] WLR (D) 176 “It was not the case that section 72(9)(b) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 only applied if the Secretary of State had notified the applicant that he had issued a certificate under the section. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 1:15 pm
R. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 8:33 am
See Ozaltin v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 8:00 am
In Roth v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 3:45 am
R. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court decided Burrage v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:13 pm
The Court’s reasoning Silber J considered the case of R (Animal Defenders International) v Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport [2008] UKHL 15 and concluded that even though that case is awaiting a ruling from the Grand Chamber in Strasbourg, he was bound by the House of Lords’ ruling that the prohibitions on political advertising contained in sections 319 and 321 of the 2003 Act were justified as being necessary in a democratic society… [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 8:57 pm
Pro. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a legally cognizable claim. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:57 am
B. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
R. [read post]
26 May 2012, 9:26 am
The appellant in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:38 am
In Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 9:08 am
R. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 7:32 am
R. [read post]
