Search for: "State v. Sebastian"
Results 121 - 140
of 168
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm
Case number: 11-cv-1271 (United States District Court for the District of Columbia) Case filed: July 13, 2011 Qualifying Judgment/Order: July 23, 2012 09/04/2012 12/03/2012 2012-83 SEC v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 3:29 am
Kay v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 11:29 am
Kay v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 7:44 am
Article 24(5) confers exclusive jurisdiction on the courts of the Member State in which the judgment was made and to be enforced by, regardless of the domicile of the parties. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:22 am
Europe The European Data Protection Board published an opinion on data transfers between EU member states and Russia. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 6:01 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:57 am
EU-Member state issues: need to ask new questions—is a regulation v a directive conclusive? [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Such quarterly disclosures state whether the issuer’s relevant officers or directors have traded in securities subject to the issuer’s buyback program within 10 business days before or after its announcement.[8] Shortcomings of the SEC’s Reforms The key shortcoming of the SEC reforms are the absence of prospective disclosure requirements with respect to the adoption of Rule 10b5-1 Trading Arrangements and other trading arrangements despite its stated purpose of… [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:13 am
Constitutional law » United States. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 9:28 am
Just a little bit more pressure and all would be under control.Then, when the landmark MGM Studios v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am
Sebastian v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 3:09 pm
Garland (2022) (Barrett, J.); United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
Constitution.V.L. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:00 am
Some Thoughts on Marei von Saher v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 10:21 pm
William Downey, Managing Director at W J Downey & Associates and graduate (cum laude) from the Saint Georges School of Law (1996), said, In Antigua v United States, the World Trade Organization (WTO) said the United States could restrict online gambling on sporting events, but could not prohibit offshore companies from offering online betting on horse racing. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 6:07 am
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 10:29 am
Serova v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am
The ICO released a statement in response, stating that it does not share the views of the report. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 8:21 am
Secretary of State John Kerry. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
The report stated that, on a specific setting, correct matches were made 89% of the time and there was no statistically significant gender or race bias. [read post]
