Search for: "State v. Shirk" Results 121 - 140 of 215
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2012, 7:39 am by Justin P. Webb
Judge Silverman wrote an interesting dissent in United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 9:08 am by Marcia Coyle
“The Montana Supreme Court has shirked its responsibility to follow that decisions and the United States Supreme Court should reverse their ruling. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:41 am by 1 Crown Office Row
It is of course open to member states to provide for rights more generous than those guaranteed by the Convention, but such provision should not be the product of interpretation of the Convention by national courts, since the meaning of the Convention should be uniform throughout the states party to it. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 5:46 am
District Court in United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
Supreme Court hear our defense of S.B. 1070.”  (The state’s case is Arizona v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 12:30 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Under such conditions, judges will shirk—i.e., look for ways of deciding cases with minimal effort. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 10:40 am by Guest Blogger
The following is a guest post from Anita Krishankumar: Justice Scalia’s dissenting opinion in Sykes v. [read post]