Search for: "State v. Smith" Results 121 - 140 of 10,611
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2012, 1:38 am by sally
Regina (Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster)) v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change [2012] EWHC 46 (Admin); [2012] WLR (D) 16 “Following the grant of a consent under section 37 of the Electricity Act 1989 (as amended) in respect of any operation or change of use that constituted development, a direction made by the Secretary of State under section 90(2) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 that planning permission for that and any ancillary… [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 5:00 am by Bruce Ackerman
Nathan Smith's challenge to the war against the Islamic State before the D.C. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 2:56 am by Immigration Prof
Mark Joseph Stern for Slate recaps the oral arguments in the Supreme Court yesterday in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 4:03 pm
Smith, American University, has posted an article, Sexual Abuse of Women in United States Prisons: A Modern Corollary of Slavery. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 12:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: In New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 7:46 am by Adam Steinman
Yesterday the Supreme Court issued a 7-2 decision in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 6:59 pm by Dwight Sullivan
We’ve been following the cert petition in Smith v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:34 am by Tim Zubizarreta
Smith, a case asking whether states may be sued in each other’s courts without consent. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 12:48 pm by Thomas Berg
And Smith set off a long chain of events: The passage of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and its state equivalents. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 11:55 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
He was sentenced to 10 years in prison, the maximum term allowed by state law. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 11:52 am
              In a prior post, I have analyzed the justices’ treatment of the questions presented in the petition in Smith v. [read post]