Search for: "State v. Song"
Results 121 - 140
of 2,073
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2020, 12:22 pm
Perhaps not surprisingly, given the topic.First off, Judge Hurwitz's take for the majority:"In the mid-1960s, a popular song warned that we were “on the eve of destruction. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:14 pm
Newton v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 12:42 pm
In a 10-page decision in Scorpio Music S.A. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Since the parties in Party City have settled that action, this decision will probably stand unless and until the issue reaches the California Supreme Court in another one of the many Song-Beverly actions currently pending in the state. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 5:21 pm
And the 38 page decision in Board of County Commissioners of Washington County v. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 5:02 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 4:34 pm
Browne v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 4:30 am
Somal v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 5:59 am
Ars Technica and Wired.com report that Oklahoma State University, after receiving the order to show cause in Arista v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 9:45 am
By Eric Goldman Atlantic Recording Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 11:08 am
The Court addressed important principles of “users’ rights”, and re-stated its finding in the oft-quoted CCH Canadian Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:07 am
" However, in the one case where the matter has been argued, the result was inconclusive (Francis Day & Hunter Ltd v Bron [1963] Ch. 587.) [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 3:23 pm
Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2008, 6:04 am
In Arista v. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 3:53 am
Watts v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 2:54 pm
” Morton v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 10:15 am
That is the question at the heart of the case that the United States Supreme Court will hear in its fall 2022 term. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 10:15 am
That is the question at the heart of the case that the United States Supreme Court will hear in its fall 2022 term. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 5:22 am
The case, Madigan v. [read post]
