Search for: "State v. Sosa" Results 121 - 140 of 229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2010, 6:58 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
It is important not to lose sight of these cases, which the Supreme Court explicitly approved in Sosa v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:49 pm by Kenneth Anderson
 With circuits having gone different directions on this issue, this perhaps tees up a SCOTUS review that would revisit its last, delphic pronouncement on the Alien Tort Statute in Sosa v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:43 pm by Donald Childress
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 9:01 pm by Julian Ku
See Sosa, 542 U.S. at 714-718, 722-724 & n.15. [read post]
The views expressed in these posts are those of the authors, and not of the Attorney-General's department or the Australian Government] The decision of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum is remarkable for a number a reasons. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:09 pm by Anthony Colangelo
Smith – an early piracy case on which the Court relied in Sosa v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 11:35 pm
This was made clear in his decision in Sosa v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:30 am
Supreme Court (above left) set out in Sosa v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendant states that a successful result in the Underlying Claim could not be established since plaintiff stated that the door locks were functioning properly on the day of the incident and plaintiff did not know who attacked him (plaintiff EBT, at 17, 19). [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 8:26 pm
  The circumstances for this week's Kiobel hearing therefore seems quite different than the context for the Supreme Court's earlier review of the ATS in Sosa v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
After a brief surge in litigation, the Supreme Court significantly curtailed the ATS’s effectiveness tremendously in Sosa v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 9:18 am by John Bellinger
  In its seminal 2004 opinion in Sosa, the Supreme Court had specifically left open the question of whether the ATS applies to non-state actors, such as corporations. [read post]