Search for: "State v. Souter"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,243
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2008, 2:50 pm
United States (07-214) is available here. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 7:20 am
The Court has issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:41 am
Stanford student Jacob Heller summarizes Monday's argument in Republic of Iraq v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 11:10 am
In Kentucky v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 11:24 am
Justice Jackson made this point in a barb at Justice Frankfurter in West Virginia State Bd of Educ. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 9:34 am
Yet, in Sosa v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 3:03 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 10:55 am
In Brown v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 9:17 am
Abdul-Kabir v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 10:31 pm
Writing for the majority, Justice Souter stated that "we have always known what custodial secrecy leads to," and that without this ruling "federal agents would be free to question suspects for extended periods before bringing them out in the open. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 4:05 pm
In Medellin v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 1:00 pm
Both here -- in the arbitration context -- as well as elsewhere.So let's hear it for the Ginsberg-Scalia-Kennedy-Souter-Thomas party. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 9:53 am
Supreme Court opinion, Baze v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:08 am
Harper:Members of this Court last discussed the outer bounds of state court review in the present context in Bush v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 12:15 am
Furthermore, from the defendant's perspective, adversarial proceedings certainly have been initiated once he has been informed of charges and had his liberty restricted, regardless of whether the prosecutor is involved Next, Justice Souter addressed the County's reliance on United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
A little more than a year ago, back in February 2008, a majority of the Supreme Court stated, in Riegel v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
Souter voted to hear the joint appeal of Salim Ahmed Hamdan and Omar Ahmed Khadr, but it takes the votes of four to grant review. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 2:41 pm
Stanford student Anthony Dick summarizes Monday’s argument in Horne v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:35 am
It starts with this notable sentence: "The California sentencing law that the Court strikes down today is indistinguishable in any constitutionally significant respect from the advisory Guidelines scheme that the Court approved in United States v. [read post]
