Search for: "State v. State Tax Commission"
Results 121 - 140
of 2,350
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2007, 3:43 am
Oklahoma Tax Commission, the Court held that a railroad need not prove intentional discrimination to challenge factual determinations made by a state in the application of its valuation methodology. 481 U.S. 454, 462- 63 (1987). . . . [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am
Next, Ramos v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
Last week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:04 pm
Note: This separation between church and state is extended to ministers and rabbis and other church leaders who are themselves exempt from Social Security taxes. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 9:02 am
It thus goes further in this case than in Case C-129/00 Commission v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 9:28 am
The app tax will be imposed one way or the other. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am
Ohio is one of only five states with a statewide gross receipts tax, but faced with declining corporate income tax revenues, other states are beginning to look to the Ohio CAT as a model. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am
Next, Ramos v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:43 pm
The Court concluded that the final sentence of MCL 211.34c(6), which prevents judicial review of a State Tax Commission (“STC”) decision, is unconstitutional. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 7:31 am
State ex rel. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 1:02 pm
Supreme Court—South Dakota v. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 12:37 am
Of the three key decisions that were scheduled for today, the least important one (a Nokia v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
After Bush v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 1:05 pm
Commission on State Mandates (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 266, 272-274; County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 8:06 pm
” And that means that as long as the website realizes $10,000 a year in gross receipts from “click-through” commissions, the site has to charge users for state sales taxes. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 5:34 pm
Petitioners named and cited as interested parties, in addition to the charitable and noncharitable residuary legatees, the Attorney General of the State of New York (AG), the United States Treasury Department--Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and the New York State Tax Commission (Commission). [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 9:20 am
Utah State Tax Commission, 225 P.3d 153, 171 (Utah 2009). [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 1:30 pm
Both Wanamaker v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 8:10 am
In the 1948 case Morgan v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 9:49 pm
Manahattan Probate Lawyers said the petitioners named and cited as interested parties, in addition to the charitable and non-charitable residuary legatees, the Attorney General of the State of New York (AG), the United States Treasury Department--Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and the New York State Tax Commission (Commission). [read post]
