Search for: "State v. Tompkins" Results 121 - 140 of 231
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Andrew Hamm
Tompkins, state anti-SLAPP (Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation) statutes apply in federal diversity cases, as the U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:01 am by Bexis
Supreme Court case, Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 9:06 am by Ryan Scoville
Tompkins, but also displaces a large body of diverse state law without constitutional authorization or any supporting federal interest. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 6:47 am
Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938), including the conflict of law rules of the state in which the federal court sits. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 8:35 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Comcast 23andMe’s Browsewrap Fails, But Its Post-Purchase Clickthrough Works Anyway–Tompkins v. 23andMe Telephony Provider Didn’t Properly Form a “Telephone-Wrap” Contract–James v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:03 am
Inasmuch as plaintiffs elected to accept the settlement without asserting their current claim that they were entitled to an additional amount representing the architectural and engineering fees, the settlement gave rise to an accord and satisfaction (see Gimper, Inc. v Giacchetta, 221 AD2d 682, 684 [1995]; Hemingway v State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:55 am by Bexis
Tompkins, federal courts sitting in diversity jurisdiction should not usurp the function of state appellate courts and predict expansions of state tort law. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:45 am
Limitations on collective bargaining under the Taylor LawCity of New York v Uniformed Fire Officers Asso. [read post]