Search for: "State v. Tri-State Pharmaceutical"
Results 121 - 140
of 458
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
The point is that just about everyone who wants to sue anyone in the pharmaceutical and medical device world has at some time tried to use off-label use and promotion to get the job done. [read post]
20 May 2014, 11:33 am
Eckhardt v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 9:22 am
(3) In Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 8:16 am
August 25, 2023 decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in FTC v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
Pharmaceuticals: GLAXO AND SUBSIDIARY SETTLE CIVIL, CRIMINAL CASES FOR $750 MILLION, United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 3:00 am
Whitlock v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 10:39 am
Tri-Union Seafoods, L.L.C., 2007 WL 87633, at *1 (D.N.J. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:12 am
On the other hand, companies supporting i4i heavily rely on patent protection, and include originating pharmaceutical companies as well as start-ups. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:37 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 2:34 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and its federal and state progeny. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
Almost since Buckman has been decided, courts have tried to chip away at it, something we've discussed before. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 9:04 pm
It relied very heavily upon the 1920 precedent in Missouri v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 1:41 pm
Tri-Union Seafoods LLC, No. 07-1238, slip op. (3d Cir. [read post]
30 May 2017, 9:31 pm
In Vernor v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 3:24 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993). [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:34 pm
/Novartis Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
Whether the plaintiff tried that here, we don’t know. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2008 WL 7136137 (Ala. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 8:02 am
Plaintiff next tried to argue differential diagnosis. [read post]