Search for: "State v. Vice"
Results 121 - 140
of 5,160
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
During oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:03 am
It states that at "the time fixed for the beginning of [the President's] term," "if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm
[Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Incompatibility Clause both apply to "officers under the United States" and must thus mean the same thing] The oral argument today in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:44 am
For the President and the Vice President of the United States are the only elected officials who represent all the voters in the Nation. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
” So, members drafted a provision that declared that “No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any… [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
In Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 11:00 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
And tomorrow, Thursday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:19 am
Article II, section one of the Constitution specifically provides that states –state legislatures enacting state laws; and state courts and election officials in faithfully applying such laws – are assigned the constitutional power to choose the "Manner" of selecting their state's allotted number of electors for President and Vice President. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:58 pm
The Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Groff v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
The state courts, for example, are not trying to enjoin Donald Trump from taking office. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:35 am
Link: Listen to Live Arguments at the Court The case, Trump v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:21 pm
Class V. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:59 am
Trump v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 7:18 am
United States Courts. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]