Search for: "State v. Vos" Results 121 - 140 of 202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2022, 4:57 am by Zak Gowen
 In choosing that test over the “statement of claim” test applied at first instance, the leading judgment (authored by Master of the Rolls, Sir Geoffrey Vos) stated that the FII test “must be intended to operate in all situations in which there has been a mistake, fraud or concealment, and to be consistent with the Limitation Act more generally. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 1:08 am
"Comments - Leduc Wetaskiwin Pipestone... - http://editors-comment.blogspot.com/   Road rage drivers beware – Constitutionally SpeakingBy Pierre De Vos "It is true that the crime of crimen injuria does exist in South African law. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
On Monday 28 and Tuesday 29 November 2011 the Court of Appeal (Lord Judge LCJ, Lord Neuberger MR and Maurice Kay LJ) heard the appeals in Phillips v NGN and Coogan v NGN against orders of Mr Justice Vos in phone hacking claims (see [2011] EWHC 349 (Ch)). [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:39 am
Therefore, the MR concluded (at para 83): Accordingly, I would dismiss these appeals, as: i) Much of the information on the voicemail messages of the claimants which have been intercepted by Mr Mulcaire is likely to have been 'commercial information or other intellectual property' within section 72(5); ii) Although some of the information was not 'commercial information or other intellectual property', and, in Ms Phillips's case, the confidence may have been that of her… [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:36 pm
I agree with the judgment of Vos J. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 4:44 am by INFORRM
On Monday 28 March 2011, the “Guardian” also reported on the hearing the previous Friday before Mr Justice Vos in the case of Miller v NGN and Mulcaire and the retrieval of the lost email archive. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:05 am by INFORRM
Well, states cannot bring actions for libel but individuals can and any member of the Bahrain government defamed in the Independent would, in theory, have a claim. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:50 am by Zak Gowen
Einer Elhauge, has stated:  “Dozens of empirical studies have now confirmed this economic reality that common shareholding alters corporate behavior. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am by John Elwood
United States, 18-7096. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
Kitchin LJ was supported by Floyd LJ and Sir Geoffrey Vos, both of wh [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
The promotions to the Court of Appeal also included Mr Justice Vos (the judge who is currently managing the phone hacking litigation in the Chancery Division) and Mr Justice Fulford (the judge who has been presiding in the trials arising out of Operation Weeting and Operation Eleveden). [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Mr Justice Vos will hear applications in the phone hacking cases of Hoppen v NGN and Miller v NGN. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 8:29 am by Florian Mueller
But if you don't (or shouldn't) believe in your case, you'll most likely suffer a defeat, or a multi-year stay, and you might then be better off with a lay jury in a non-tech-savvy rural area.Next week the Düsseldorf Regional Court will decide on two more Huawei v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 6:07 am by Florian Mueller
In fact, I made a correction earlier today to last week's report on Judge Voss's order to stay a Samsung v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 9:18 am by Florian Mueller
One of those defenses, prior user rights, persuaded Judge Andreas Voss ("Voß" in German), who also presided over the Apple case involving this patent, to reopen proceedings. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
Mr Justice Vos also granted an application for specific disclosure by the Claimants and gave judgment. [read post]