Search for: "State v. Wink" Results 121 - 140 of 166
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2010, 7:57 am by Kevin Schad appellate division SDOH
To hold otherwise wouldallow the State to accomplish 'with a wink and a nod' what it cannot do overtly. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 6:11 am
In the Second Circuit, which includes New York, the test for confusion is that as laid down in the Polaroid Corp v Polarad Elecs. [read post]
4 May 2010, 11:50 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
I have been absolutely swamped at work so it's been a little difficult to find time to analyze the Salazar v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 10:36 am by Beck, et al.
(Aside for non-lawyers: “diverse” = plaintiff and defendants are citizens of different states; “non-diverse” = citizens of same state on both sides of the “v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 4:44 am by Jeff Gamso
(We can hope that the Court will at least loosen that rule when it decides Pottawattamie County v. [read post]