Search for: "State v. Word" Results 121 - 140 of 40,415
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2024, 10:40 am by Dylan Gibbs
.🤖 A US judge used ChatGPT to interpret the word “landscaping” in an insurance contract. [read post]
Instead, most states authorize the attorney general of the state to oversee and enforce charitable trusts. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 11:49 pm by Donald Dinnie
MEC for the Department of Health Free State Province v G.A.K obo M.A.K (2795/2015) [2024] ZAFSHC 142 (25 April 2024) (saflii.org) [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 10:30 pm by Alessandro Marcia
In other words, LGBTIQA+ issues never appear as the starting point of the analysis but rather as an incidental reference in the context of other research topics (on this point, see Belavusau). [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
First, following Curistan v Times Newspapers [2009] QB 231, qualified privilege operates so that the relevant privileged words are ignored for defamation purposes, at least as far as meaning is concerned, except insofar as they provide context for non-privileged words [56]. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:32 am by Guest Author
This was the position clearly taken by the Court in 1940, in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:26 am by Tobin Admin
Accordingly, the Court of Appeals affirmed the state court’s grant of the motion on the claims against the police officer’s individual capacity as he was entitled to qualified immunity. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 5:51 am by Melissa Stewart
” Despite the fact that marine ecosystems serve as “sinks and reservoirs of greenhouse gasses,” the text of UNCLOS does not mention the words “greenhouse gasses” or “climate change. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:47 am by Michael Oykhman
The case of R v ML, 2021 NBCA 27 also stated that the actus reus is made out where a “reasonable person aware of the circumstances would perceive the words as a threat of death or bodily harm”. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm by Jon May
Indeed, thirteen states, have had these words removed from their ethical rules. [read post]