Search for: "State v. Yates" Results 121 - 140 of 423
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2008, 10:52 pm
Yates v Yates, 259 Ga. 131, Moore v Moore, 249 Ga. 27 (1982), Lowery v Lowery, 262 Ga 20 (1992), and Peters v Peters, 248 Ga. 4980 (1981). [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 2:01 pm
Yates, No. 06-55867 (10-6-08). [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
’s conduct occurred while he was in an automatistic state that was not caused by a mental disorder. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am by Matthew Kahn
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit disagreed, concluding that it was bound by its 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 5:04 am by Kiel Brennan-Marquez
For a concrete example of what I have in mind, consider Yates v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 10:26 am by Lyle Denniston
”  That would be a perfect description of the argument Wednesday in Yates v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 5:18 am by Dr Mark Summerfield
On appeal, Justice Bennett, Justice Nicholas and Justice Yates have found that the relevant claims of the XR patent are invalid, and that the primary judge erred in finding that they were entitled to the benefit the priority date of United States Patent Application No 60/14006, filed on 25 March 1996. [read post]