Search for: "Stevens v. State Corporation Commission" Results 121 - 140 of 282
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm by ToddHenderson
” Or take this zinger from Justice Stevens’s opinion: “The Court’s ruling threatens to undermine the integrity of elected institutions across the Nation” and “do damage to this institution” as well. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly:    At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the court’s recent decision to review National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 10:03 am by Rick Garnett
Schierl/Fort Howard Corporation Professor of Law at the University of Notre Dame. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 4:30 am by Stanford Law Review
Federal Election Commission, make it exceedingly difficult to maintain that independent expenditures by corporations ‘do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
A similar rationale might be offered for partisan-balance rules applicable to various federal agencies, including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Trade Commission, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, the Commission on Civil Rights, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and the Federal Election Commission.The Third Circuit opinion expressed skepticism about whether partisan… [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 11:12 am by Fred Wertheimer
Federal Election Commission (corporate independent expenditure ban), McCutcheon v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc., RM Enterprises International, Inc., Steven Y. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 9:10 am
Mahoney, Jr., Esquire of Stradley Ronon, Stevens andamp; Young, L.L.P., also in Philadelphia. andnbsp; Nicholas J. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 8:55 am
Federal Election Commission (08-205). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:34 pm by INFORRM
On January 21, in its first decision of this term, Citizens United v. [read post]