Search for: "Stevens v. United States of America" Results 121 - 140 of 576
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
United States “may have opened up a big can of worms. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie writes that “the majority opinion in Flowers, penned by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, stretched to 31 pages but, as it said, broke ‘no new legal ground. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 6:18 am by Dennis Crouch
United States Postal Service, et al. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie writes that Monday’s decision in Virginia House of Delegates v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
Administrative Review Board, United States Department of Labor, which became known as “the Case of the Frozen Trucker. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  Many thinkers presented in Conservatives and the Constitutioncelebrated the United States as a Protestant country, insisting that both immigration and educational policy be devoting to keeping America Christian, and that reproductive policy favor conservative Christian notions of marriage and se [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:00 am by Sandy Levinson
Balkin, Democracy and Dysfunction (University of Chicago Press, 2019).There is much that could be said about the contribution of my friend Steven Calabresi to our symposium. [read post]
31 May 2019, 7:05 am by Andrew Hamm
” At The Daily Beast, Ronald Goldfarb argues that the 1967 case United States v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 7:15 am by Andrew Hamm
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie writes that “it seems that the conservative justices on the nation’s highest court (with the notable exception of Clarence Thomas) are content to plod along rather than rush headlong into a decision that could spark a dangerous new flashpoint in the culture wars. [read post]
25 May 2019, 7:19 am by John Floyd
  To hold otherwise would mean that the President of the United States is “above the rule of law” – and if a court ever renders such a judicial interpretation, then America is no longer a democracy but a dictatorship. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie writes that “Justice [Neil] Gorsuch’s endorsement of the liberal interpretation gives Herrera added weight and is no surprise: a Coloradan, he came to the Supreme Court from the Tenth Circuit, where he was vigilant on questions of tribal sovereignty. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am by Andrew Hamm
If you were to ask the average citizen what values define the United States, the answer would likely include the right to speak freely without fear of government censorship and a general commitment to a free press. [read post]
3 May 2019, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie casts doubt on suggestions by Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh during oral argument in Rucho v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie writes that both this case and the entry-ban case “involve Congress granting wide discretion to executive-branch officials who then seem to offer questionable justifications for policy changes. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
First up is United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am by Ronald Collins
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Stephen Budiansky concerning Budiansky’s book “Oliver Wendell Holmes: A Life in War, Law, and Ideas” (W.W. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie writes that “[a] long-running disagreement over how to read statutes fuels the split between the court’s liberals and conservatives. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie remarks on the “curious” reasons Justice Brett Kavanaugh gave for “hesita[ting] to use Morris County as the vehicle to move the First Amendment toward a principle commanding the government to fund religious entities equally under grant programmes. [read post]