Search for: "Still v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 49,514
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2024, 2:52 am by Frank Cranmer
Background In Dr David Miller v University of Bristol [2024] ET 1400780/2022, the claimant was appointed Professor of Political Sociology at the University from 1 September 2018. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
 Therefore, even if Chief Justice Chase had held in Griffin’s Case, as Trump asserts, that “congressional enforcement legislation [is] the exclusive means for enforcing section 3” (Chase didn’t do so), and even if that proposition were correct (it’s not) or if Chase were right about what he did hold about the inability of courts to enforce Section 3 against someone already in office (he wasn’t), that still would not require… [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:17 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
  Perhaps defendants in national proceedings may still challenge the jurisdiction of national courts to hear cases based on the proper interpretation of the transitional provisions in the UPC Agreement. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 12:50 am by Tristan Marot
The Free State High Court confirms in J.H.V v Centlec (SOC) Ltd and Others that an acknowledgement of liability by the debtor interrupts prescription, even if the acknowledgement is not made directly to the creditor. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am by Will Baude
"  Trump's brief on the merits in the Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 11:30 am by Will Baude
  Had we anticipated the reaction, it still would have been beyond the scope of our project. [read post]