Search for: "Still v. Social Security Administration Commissioner"
Results 121 - 140
of 199
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2017, 6:40 pm
Before September 2016, the Social Security Administration had regulations, 20 CFR 404.1512(b)(1)(v) and 416.912(b)(1)(v), and a Social Security Ruling, 06-03p, which dealt with the weight given to other agency decisions. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:02 am
A few weeks ago, for instance, a federal district court judge (Eric Vitaliano of the Eastern District of New York) wrote an opinion rejecting a Social Security ligitant’s request to get an early opinion taken down from the court’s site (see also Eric Goldman’s post on this case): In February 2014, plaintiff Tamara Nelson filed a complaint, seeking review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security… [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
In Zamora v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 5:01 am
Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) cases are largely decided by administrative law judges (ALJs). [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm
In a recent case, San Francisco v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 7:23 am
Such legislation would almost certainly pass constitutional muster: Under South Dakota v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 9:49 am
In Israel v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 9:49 am
In Israel v. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm
The most striking legal story of the week was the reporting of the Administrative Court’s ruling on Article 50 and the Royal Prerogative ([2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin)). [read post]
Statement by Zeid Ra'ad al Hussein on the Opening of the 32nd Session of the UN Human Rights Council
14 Jun 2016, 3:19 am
In that light the fundamental questions thrown out by the High Commissioner acquires greater and more profound meaning: "Then do we really still have an international community? [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 8:10 am
As held in the case of Scarpuzza v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
Commissioner, 74 Mass. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
Commissioner, 74 Mass. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm
Even where a determination of fact is based upon 'substantial evidence' on the record, the administrative result can still be challenged as erroneous as a matter of law. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm
Even where a determination of fact is based upon 'substantial evidence' on the record, the administrative result can still be challenged as erroneous as a matter of law. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm
Bank v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 1:24 am
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or the U.S. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:12 am
An expert from Vermont, which in 2000 became thefirst jurisdiction in the United States to enact a civil union law, testified that civil union couplesthere still face problems with the law today. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
But while these issues and responsibilities are now well-recognized, many boards still struggle to translate these issues into action. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Social Security Administration, Commissioner, December 15, 2015, United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit More Blog Entries:Hanson v. [read post]
