Search for: "Strauss v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 192
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2010, 3:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
United States, 350 F.3d 299, 306 (2d Cir. 2003); accord County of Erie, 546 F.3d at 229; see also Bilzerian, 926 F.2d at 1292; von Bulow, 828 F.2d at 103; Am. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 11:59 am
The factual background in Starglade Properties v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 7:00 am by Kara OBrien
Michael Strauss, Stephen Hozie and Robert Bernstein, Civil Action No. 09-CV-4150 (RB) (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 9:44 am by uwlegalscholarship
  The Charleston Law Review has been fortunate to publish some leading civic leaders and legal scholars, including: Barack Obama; Chief Judge Karen Williams of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; John Blume, Professor at Cornell School of Law; and James Ely, Professor at Vanderbilt University School of Law. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 2:14 pm
Depending on how those proceedings turn out, we could have either (a) a Ninth Circuit opinion -- whether by three judges or by the Court en banc, it does not matter -- laying down the law for the entire Ninth Circuit on same-sex marriages, or (b) a Supreme Court decision doing the same for the entire United States. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
 For purposes of the Graves Amendment, section 30102(a)(6) of Chapter 301 of Title 49 of the United States Code, entitled Motor Vehicle Safety, defines "motor vehicle" as "a vehicle driven or drawn by mechanical power and manufactured primarily for use on public streets, roads, and highways, but does not include a vehicle operated only on a rail line. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am by Kelly
– All-Party Parliamentary IP Group (IPKat) United States US General On hiring an employee of your competitor: Bimbo Bakeries v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 10:40 am by Jay Willis
United States, in which he criticized the Department of Justice for failing to recommend that prisoners such as Dillon be pardoned. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]