Search for: "Strickland v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 498
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2019, 5:44 pm
In the (in)famous Adnan Syed murder case (anatomy of a murder) there is a petition before the United States Supreme Court asking this:Whether a court evaluating prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 2:29 am by stu@crimapp.com
Since the Court’s 1984 ruling in Strickland v Washington, the United States Supreme Court has applied a two part test for determining whether counsel was ineffective: (a) whether there was a breach of counsel’s duty to the defendant; and, (b) “but for” that error, the defendant stood a reasonable chance for acquittal. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:16 pm
United States 124 S.Ct. 786 (2003) when it recharacterized the defendant's Rule 60(b) motion. [read post]
1 May 2011, 7:09 pm by cdw
The Supreme Court of Virginia’s opposite conclusion constituted an unreasonable application of federal law, as clearly established by the Supreme Court of the United States in Strickland v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am by John Elwood
§ 2254(d) and Strickland v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 8:14 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The state courts failed to correctly apply the "prejudice" prong of Strickland v. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 6:11 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States denied Bell's petition for writ of certiorari. [read post]