Search for: "Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe" Results 121 - 140 of 351
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2019, 7:34 pm by Richard Hunt
Mootness done right – extreme version In Johnson v. 162 Los Gatos-Saratoga Rd., LLC, 2019 WL 2869949, (N.D. [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:52 pm
(…) One example of an article that has been found to be a composite good under GRI 3 is the type of product that was at issue in CamelBak Prods., LLC v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:27 am by MOTP
(holding Rule 11 agreement enforced by breach-of contract claim); see also Padilla v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 9:55 am
 Popular consensus suggests that Mr Gleissner does this with commercial gain in mind [and not for the sheer, heady love of trade mark procedure].Readers might remember Mr Gleissner from such previous trade mark actions as Sherlock Systems CV v Apple Inc (concerning 68 applications to revoke trade marks owned by Apple for non-use) and CKL Holdings Limited v Paper Stacked Limited (the "Alexander" case), which involved two of his more… [read post]