Search for: "Strong v. Clark" Results 121 - 140 of 455
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am by Mark Spinney, Olswang LLP
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am by Mark Spinney, Olswang LLP
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 9:00 pm
County of Clark, 836 F.2d 1185 (9th Cir. 1988). [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 3:12 am by Maurizio Borghi
The Judge used the Coco v Clark test to submit that the quality of confidence was of the right quality. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am by INFORRM
Gama Endustri Tesisleri Imalat Montaj AS v Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment [2005] IEHC 119 (22 April 2005) (Kelly J), Cogley v Radio Telifís Eireann [2005] 4 IR 79, [2005] IEHC 180 (8 June 2005) (Clarke J) and Murray v Newsgroup Newspapers [2010] IEHC 248 (Irvine J) are all to similar effect. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 8:47 am
Lately we've been distracted by the salacious, sensational lawsuit of Charney v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:42 pm by PaulKostro
However, “[v]oluntary accommodations regarding matrimonial differences are highly desirable and make a major contribution to the fulfillment of ‘the strong public policy favoring stability of arrangements. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 9:32 pm by MTTLR Blog Editor
In the absence of strong objections from the parties, Judge Clark will submit an ongoing royalty rate question to the juries in three cases pending trial.16 Judge Clark gives an example of such a question as follows:17 What rate or sum of money, if any, do you find is adequate as a reasonable royalty to compensate Plaintiff for the conduct you found to infringe that occurs in the future? [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:00 am by Dennis Crouch
Kimberly-Clark Corporation, No. 14-10337 MobileMedia Ideas LLC v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm by Matthew Hill
” Comment Although there are strong grounds for distinguishing the present case from those concerning the decisions of individual NHS trusts not to provide particular drugs or treatments, a comparison seems at first sight to throw up an odd anomaly. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:42 am by Kent Scheidegger
Supreme Court today declined to review the case of Washington State murderer Clark Elmore. [read post]