Search for: "Stucky v. Stucky"
Results 121 - 140
of 161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2012, 9:26 am
The appellant in United States v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 2:46 pm
Judge Stucky wrote for a majority consisting of him, Judge Erdmann, and Judge Ryan. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 5:36 pm
In a majority opinion (another 3-2 split) written by Judge Erdmann, CAAF reversed an aggravated sexual assault conviction under the beleaguered new Article 120, UCMJ, in the Air Force case of U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 2:50 pm
Pena v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 1:54 pm
See United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 6:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 12:14 pm
" Smith v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 1:00 pm
So if Judge Erdmann takes the same position he did in Leak, he will likely join the apparent Effron-Baker-Stucky majority. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 2:03 pm
In contrast to CAAF's opinion in Forney, United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 1:17 pm
Judge Stucky dissented. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 3:37 pm
From United States v. [read post]
United States v. Fosler: CAAF holds Article 134 adultery sample specification fails to state offense
8 Aug 2011, 11:53 pm
Is Parker v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:22 pm
Judge Stucky wrote for the majority, and Judge Ryan wrote a dissent for herself and Judge Erdmann in US v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 3:34 pm
" United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 7:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 9:12 pm
United States, 66 M.J. 114 (C.A.A.F. 2008), CAAF ruled 3-2 (Judges Stucky and Ryan dissenting) that CAAF retained jurisdiction to issue a writ of error coram nobis eight years after appellate review of a court-martial was complete.In United States v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 4:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:17 am
” U.S. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 5:10 pm
., v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 6:21 pm
See Assange v. [read post]
