Search for: "Sullivan v. Georgia" Results 121 - 140 of 158
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2012, 6:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Sullivan; the NYT depends on ownership of copyright to protect freedom of expression. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Diaz-Ibarra, No. 07-4420 Sentence for being found in the U.S. after having been deported subsequent to a conviction for an aggravated felony is affirmed where the sentencing judge did not err in applying a sentencing enhancement since violation of former Georgia Code Ann. section 16-6-4 categorically constituted "sexual abuse of a minor," which the Sentencing Guidelines define as a "crime of violence. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Problem areas include what “unaware” means, the exclusion of electronic communications such as emails and the very broad common law definition of “publication” which has not changed since Duke of Brunswick v Hamer (1849) 14 QB 185. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
While is why the Sixth Circuit (over a dissent) just applied Chevron and Rust v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[24] Courts in Georgia, Hawaii, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia do not enforce Type II agreements and only enforce Type I agreements.[25] Other jurisdictions enforce both Type I and Type II agreements as binding. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Campaigns Say They’ll Match Political Contributions. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
(IP Think Tank) A defining time for the IP market (IAM) Busting an intellectual capital myth (Pat Sullivan’s Blog) Governments, financial stakeholders meet on policy for IP as collateral (Intellectual Property Watch) (IP finance) How much should you spend on start-up marketing? [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:20 am
UPDATE:  The California Supreme Court's decision in Rico v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]