Search for: "T. WILKIE" Results 121 - 140 of 265
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
” For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes writes that “[t]he motion filed Wednesday night is highly unusual but is representative of the enormous consequences of the decision and the politics surrounding it. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:17 pm by Steve Vladeck
And although the manner in which President Trump pulled this off may not violate the plain letter of the FVRA, it certainly can’t be reconciled with the law’s  spirit. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:30 am by Kellie McTammany
</p> </div> <div style="padding-top:0px;padding-bottom:0px;margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:35px;" data-rss-type="text"> <p style="margin:0px;"> If you have questions about eligibility for Veterans benefits or other planning questions, please don’t hesitate to <a href="https://rochesterelderlaw.com/contact-us/"> … [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
Wilkie, in which the justices have been asked to reconsider precedents that require courts to defer to a federal agency’s reasonable interpretation of its own regulations. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
Wilkie, in which the justices reconsidered precedents that require courts to defer to a federal agency’s reasonable interpretation of its own regulations, “it seems more likely than not that the court will overturn Auer. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
” Robert Barnes reports for The Washington Post that “[t]t’s difficult to say with certainty why” the court reached different results in the two cases, but “the obvious place to start is new Justice Brett M. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr reports that “[[t]he order marked an abrupt shift for the court, which last month voted 5-4 to let Alabama execute a Muslim man without his imam. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
” Greg Stohr and Jennifer Dlouhy report at Bloomberg that “[t]he high court debate was an unusually lopsided one in which neither lawyer gave a full-throated defense of the 1997 ruling. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
Wilkie, in which they will reconsider precedents that require courts to defer to a federal agency’s reasonable interpretation of its own regulations. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
Wilkie somewhat critical of Auer deference, i.e. of deference to the federal government’s own positions. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:06 am by Christopher Walker
Wilkie, in which the Supreme Court will consider whether to overturn Auer deference to agency regulatory interpretations. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that “[t]he court’s action means that the corporation must provide information to the special counsel or pay mounting financial penalties. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 2:23 pm by Mark Walsh
” Maybe a lot of people don’t read it, Gorsuch continues, not least because “maybe they can’t read it. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 12:59 pm by Ronda Muir
Caplan didn’t pay much attention to those [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 12:59 pm by Ronda Muir
Wouldn’t his clients think it might? [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Daily Caller, Kevin Daley reports that “[t]he Supreme Court seemed largely united in its sympathy for Flowers and in the feeling that [prosecutor Doug] Evans’s prior conduct was relevant. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 8:55 am by Amy Howe
Wilkie, as well as at Howe on the Court, where it was originally published. [read post]