Search for: "TAYLOR v TAYLOR" Results 121 - 140 of 4,761
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
In the recent case (Taylor v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 3:36 am by Donald Dinnie
This Gauteng judgment Trident South Africa (Pty) Ltd / Bateman Trident (Pty) Ltd v Shainne John Taylore & 2 Others has reaffirmed that economic pressure does not in itself create a basis to escape a settlement agreement on the grounds of duress. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
On Thursday 14 March 2024 there was a contempt application in the case of Taylor v Chief Constable of Kent, QB-2022-000310. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
By Atreya Mathur ​​In a world where creativity knows no bounds and the lines between art, inspiration and infringement blur, one art collective stands at the forefront of pushing these boundaries. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Kent v Lefkowitz, 27 NY3d 499, the Appellate Division affirmed PERB's rejection of County's contract reversion defense, explaining "Duty satisfaction occurs when a specific subject has been negotiated to fruition and may be established by contractual terms that either expressly or implicitly demonstrate that the parties had reached accord on that specific subject".*** Although the County's interpretation of the collective bargaining agreements limited its… [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Kent v Lefkowitz, 27 NY3d 499, the Appellate Division affirmed PERB's rejection of County's contract reversion defense, explaining "Duty satisfaction occurs when a specific subject has been negotiated to fruition and may be established by contractual terms that either expressly or implicitly demonstrate that the parties had reached accord on that specific subject".*** Although the County's interpretation of the collective bargaining agreements limited its… [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
On 27 February 2024, there was a hearing in the case of Rodoy v Optical Express Limited and others KB-2023-002437. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]; Goldfarb v Hoffman, 139 AD3d 474, 475 [1st Dept 2016]; Cascardo v Dratel, 171 AD3d 561, 562 [1st Dept 2019]; see CPLR 3211 [a] [1], [7]). [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am by INFORRM
There was also a strike out application in the case of Vince v Associated Newspapers Limited. [read post]