Search for: "THOMAS CASEY" Results 121 - 140 of 574
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2022, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Casey and signaling, for now, the end of a right to abortion in the United States. [read post]
Justice Thomas noted that the jurisprudence focused on autonomy and privacy, as opposed to the right to abortion. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 7:09 am
 While no opinion accompanied the order, the court noted that Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented from the decision. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 7:41 am
Wade based on his Casey opinion. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 9:07 pm
  He's interviewed by David Rivkin and Lee Casey, a pair of prominent lawyers who do a fair share of writing on the side. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The second half of the Joint Dissent is devoted to defending Roe and Casey on stare decisis grounds. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Meanwhile, the Court’s most conservative Justices—Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito—have made plain their goal of overturning the right to abortion as soon as they have the votes.So, what did we learn? [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 10:58 am by JB
The first is in Casey and in Justice Ginsburg's dissent in Carhart II. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 9:09 pm
Thomas Bauch, Hall Capital ($1,000) Theodore Boutrous, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher ($25,000) Janice Brown, Brown Law Group ($12,500) David Casey, Casey Gerry Schenk Francavilla Blatt & Penfield ($50,000) Marsha Cohen, Hastings College of the Law ($10,000) Laura Covington, Yahoo Inc. ($10,000) Diana Dooley, California Children's Hospital Association ($500) David Drummond, Google Inc. ($25,000) Alan Fox*, ACF Property Management ($50,000) Fred… [read post]
Casey,a state can regulate abortion before viability as long as it does not impose an undue burden on a woman’s right to terminate a pregnancy. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Implicit in these decisions is a recognition that it is a rare case where errors in the conduct of an election are so pervasive as to vitiate the fundamental fairness of the election (see Appeal of Casey-Tomasi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,301; Appeal of Lanzilotta, 48 id. 428, Decision No. 15,905; Appeal of Thomas, 47 id. 442, Decision No. 15,748). [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Implicit in these decisions is a recognition that it is a rare case where errors in the conduct of an election are so pervasive as to vitiate the fundamental fairness of the election (see Appeal of Casey-Tomasi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,301; Appeal of Lanzilotta, 48 id. 428, Decision No. 15,905; Appeal of Thomas, 47 id. 442, Decision No. 15,748). [read post]