Search for: "THOMAS HILL v. THE STATE" Results 121 - 140 of 711
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2010, 7:22 am by James Bickford
The recent telephone call from Virginia Thomas to Anita Hill continues to draw comment. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:12 am by Amy Howe
 Briefly: In Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Tony Mauro looks at Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s argument in Gamble v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Dayton, University of Connecticut, and Sharon V. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 10:57 am
This Thursday, June 19th: 11:00 AM - Michael Hill v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
Yesterday, the Court heard arguments in United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:01 am by Joshua Matz
  The Hill discusses some of the amicus briefs filed recently in support of respondent Antoine Jones in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:20 am by James Bickford
Thomas; at the Blog of Legal Times, Tony Mauro highlights her comment that the widely reported phone call to Anita Hill was “probably a mistake on my part. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:22 am by WSLL
Summary of Decision February 25, 2014Justice Hill delivered the opinion of the Court. [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:03 am
Joining in the Thomas opinion were Chief Justice John G. [read post]
16 May 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Recently the editors of the New York Times seriously warned that some states likely would outlaw interracial marriage if Roe v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
Stitt and United States v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 7:11 am
Back in September, my colleague Jessie Hill previewed the case for SCOTUSBlog here. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:01 am by WSLL
Case Name: IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP AND CONSERVATORSHIP OF THOMAS LANKFORD: MAUREEN UTLEY and NORMA BALLWEG v. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 11:47 am by Katherine Pompilio
Orin Kerr analyzed an Eastern District of Virginia judge’s ruling in U.S. v. [read post]