Search for: "TIME, INCORPORATED v. Motor Publications" Results 121 - 140 of 178
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2012, 6:31 am
In the case of Gram Panchayat & Anr. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
NEMA contended that the relevant statutory definition unambiguously excluded all such motors exceeding 1 horsepower, as well as certain motors rated at and less than 1 horsepower, from being regulated as small electric motors. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
§ 31.12 Public Duty Doctrine The Case: Ezell v. [read post]
14 May 2011, 4:03 am
Employee’s dismissal for “excessive absenteeism” failed to survive judicial scrutiny where such absences were authorized by the employer and properly documented Matter of Iarocci v Incorporated Vil. of W. [read post]
9 May 2011, 10:11 am by @ErikJHeels
* Electromotive Division of General Motors Corp. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:31 am by Andrew Dickinson
In Jacobs v Motor Insurers Bureau [2010] EWHC 231 (QB), Mr Justice Owen applied Rome II’s provisions to reach the conclusion that the compensation to be paid by the MIB (acting as the UK’s compensation body under the Fourth Motor Insurance Directive) to the claimant as a result of an accident in a Spanish shopping centre car park in December 2007 in which the other driver was German (and uninsured) should be assessed in accordance with Spanish law, as the law… [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:01 am by Anthony J. Vecchio
No new locations for the road test shall be approved unless the test can be given on public streets. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 3:46 pm by Anna Christensen
§ 153(b) provides that “three members of the Board shall, at all times, constitute a quorum of the Board. [read post]