Search for: "TITLE 4-D"
Results 121 - 140
of 5,581
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2024, 9:27 am
Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), a senior member and former chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee, attended the hearing. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 9:11 am
API production; (2) Criteria for selection of essential medicine small molecule APIs for manufacture; (3) Barriers to reshoring small molecule API manufacturing; and (4) Ways to build a resilient drug supply chain. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 10:00 am
“An employee may be on non-FMLA leave at the time he or she meets the 12-month eligibility requirement, and in that event, any portion of the leave taken for an FMLA-qualifying reason after the employee meets the eligibility requirement would be FMLA leave” (Code of Federal Regulations, Title 29, Section 825.110 (d)). [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:30 am
Over the past 4 years, during which the SUR was being drafted, agri-business spent ca. 50 million euros on lobbying. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 2:52 pm
The disclosure required by this subparagraph is not required to include persons who are expert trial witnesses or are retained as consultants who may later be designated as expert trial witnesses, as that term is described in Chapter 18 (commencing with Section 2034.010) of Title 4 of Part 4. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 8:07 am
Similarly, a title like The Cather in the Rye, translated in a literal way, would be incomprehensible to an Italian reader, with the result that JD Salinger’s famous novel is (creatively) known to the Italian public as Il Giovane Holden ('Young Holden').As noted, the Sawkins case was litigated both in France and the UK: despite that, historically, the French understanding of originality as 'la marque d’un apport intellectual' has entailed a creative… [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
We discuss two debates arising from Rule 801(d)(2): first, whether an expert’s statements are attributable to the party that retained the expert, and second, whether statements by government officials are statements by a government party, particularly in criminal cases. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 5:31 am
Bill Title: No AI Fake Replicas and Unauthorized Duplications Act of 2024 (No AI Fraud Act) Bill Text: Discussion Draft Sponsors: Representatives María Elvira Salazar (R-FL-27), Madeleine Dean (D-PA-4), Nathaniel Moran (R-TX-1), Joe Morelle (D-NY-25), Rob Wittman (R-VA-1). [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Board of Regents of University of Colorado (D. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
(D. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 11:16 am
Title 16, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 314.2(h) defines “Financial Institution” as: “[a]ny institution in the business of which is engaging in any activity that is financial in nature or incidental to such financial activities as described in section 4(k) of the Bank Company Holding Act of 1956, 12 U.S.C. 1843(k). [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
We are very familiar with this regulatory regime because we both voted to dissent from the FCC’s 2023 decision to head back down the path of reinstating those regulations.[4] There are several reasons why the FCC’s 2015 net neutrality rules failed First Amendment scrutiny that are not present in this social media context. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 11:50 am
The Court of Appeal’s Opinion Appellants PCL and NCRA unsuccessfully argued on appeal that DWR violated CEQA because: (1) the EIR’s impact analysis is deficient; (2) the EIR’s project description is inaccurate and unstable; (3) the EIR’s alternatives analysis is flawed; and (4) DWR erred in not recirculating the DEIR. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am
Canada On 2 January 2024, the Supreme Court of British Columbia awarded summary judgement on the issue of quantum in favour of the plaintiff in the case of Pineau v Glacier Media Inc 2024 BCSC 4. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 3:33 am
Fatbear Scooters, LLC, Isaac Ashkenazie and Isaac D. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 11:23 am
From yesterday's decision in Killebrew v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 6:55 am
The latter have to write a certain number of (paid) articles to earn the title. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 5:08 am
Section 2(d) - Likelihood of Confusion: Precedential No. 34: TTAB Dismisses Monster Energy's Section 2(d) Claim On Summary Judgment Due to DIssimilarity of Design Marks Precedential No. 29: After an Exhausting 2(d) Analysis, TTAB Finds HME (Stylized) Confusable with KME for Building Products Precedential No. 27: TTAB Renders Split Decision in Appeal From Section 2(d) Refusal of IMPACT for Various Healthcare Services Precedential No. 12: TTAB Hands… [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
§ 201(a)(4)(B)-(D). [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 1:59 am
The answer impacts the questions whether a trade mark for the title of the work (1) is inherently distinctive, (2) can acquire a reputation for specific goods, (3) is genuinely used and (4) can be infringed by third party use of identical or similar signs. [read post]
