Search for: "Tax Analysis v. Irs" Results 121 - 140 of 601
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2020, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
The combination and interaction of various child tax benefits—including the CTC, Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), and Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit (CDCTC)—results in complexity, vagueness, duplication, and inefficiency for filers and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 8:31 am by Ernster the Virtual Library Cat
  No surprise, then, that there is a developing body of  "Bitcoin Law".Some notable "Bitcoin Laws":the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau issued a consumer advisory in August 2014  the IRS determined that Bitcoin should be treated as  property for tax purposes - see IRS Notice 2014-21 New York State Dept. of Financial Services has issued proposed regulations of virtual currenciesUnited States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 11:05 am
Analysis:  The Court of Special Appeals first held (in contrast to Fourth Circuit precedent) that the debt-equity question is a mixed question of fact and law. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 12:11 pm by Mark Ashton
These are the ones that are supposed to come wrapped in IRS Form 709; the United States Gift Tax Return. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Though the question of whether a zombie is subject to taxation might seem far-fetched and irrelevant to current tax practice, the treatment of what could be characterized as a “zombie corporation” arose in a recent Tax Court case.In Allied Transportation, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 5:45 pm by Charles Rubin
This was a factual analysis, but the Court borrowed from other cases (including Goosen v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 5:45 pm by Charles Rubin
This was a factual analysis, but the Court borrowed from other cases (including Goosen v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 8:45 am by Roy Ginsburg
Internal Revenue Service, Employer’s Supplemental Tax Guide, Publication 15-A, p. 6 (2009) at http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p15a.pdf; see also, NLRB v. [read post]