Search for: "Taylor v. Superior Court" Results 121 - 140 of 308
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2008, 12:26 am
Perhaps the leading case illustrating this principle is Taylor v Cass, 505 NYS2d 929. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm by Bexis
Warner–Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2007), presumed to know more about Michigan law than either the Michigan courts (Taylor v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 3:38 am
An example of this is found in the Appellate Division's ruling in Taylor v Cass, 505 NYS2d 929.Under the terms of a disciplinary settlement, Taylor was subject to termination without any hearing if, in the opinion of his superior, his job performance was adversely affected by Taylor's consumption of alcohol. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
The exclusion of union representatives, said the court, "ensures that the charges will be probed confidentially and professionally by investigators independent of the employee's own agency and superiors. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 12:08 am
Taylor, a Suffolk County employee, won reinstatement with full retroactive salary and contract benefits after a court found that he was improperly dismissed during his disciplinary probation period.According to the ruling, under the terms and conditions of the probation to which Taylor had agreed, the county could terminate him without any hearing if, in the opinion of his superior, his job performance was adversely affected by his intoxication on the job during… [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 1:54 pm
 Sure, maybe Judge Taylor thought that there was sufficient evidence. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 12:15 pm
Union presence during an interrogation of a unit member by the appointing authoritySeabrook v City of New York, 2008 NY Slip Op 09471, Decided on December 4, 2008, Appellate Division, First DepartmentNorman Seabrook, individually and as President of the Correction Officers' Benevolent Association, challenged the policy of not allowing an employee to consult with a union representative after a question is posed and before an answer must be given, at an interrogation conducted pursuant… [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:39 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Remittitur The Supreme Court of Arizona rendered an opinion in Soto v, Sacco on July 13, 2017. [read post]