Search for: "Taylor v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,487
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2016, 6:08 am
The Sixth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Confidential investigators employed by the New York State Department of Law are "confidential" employees within the meaning of the Taylor Law pursuant to §201.7(b).The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_02812.htm [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Confidential investigators employed by the New York State Department of Law are "confidential" employees within the meaning of the Taylor Law pursuant to §201.7(b).The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_02812.htm [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 9:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 5:19 am
In his 1995 decision for a unanimous Court in United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 7:03 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 11:53 am
Cert was granted in Taylor v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 2:02 pm
In United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 12:19 pm
” United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 4:09 am
States and political subdivisions of states are not employers within the meaning of the National Labor Relations ActFord v D.C. 37 Union Local 1549, CA2d Circuit, Docket No. 08-2317-cvRoxanne Ford appealed a judgment by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New dismissing her complaint alleging that DC-37 breached the duty of fair representation.Ford, however, had filed her claims against DC-37 pursuant to the federal Labor… [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 11:26 am
In July 2024, the Center for Art Law met with the Korea Copyright Commission to discuss copyright protection for choreographers in the United States and the challenges related to enforcement. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Relations Bd., 39 NY3d 17, 22 [2022], quoting Matter of City of Watertown v State of N.Y. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Relations Bd., 39 NY3d 17, 22 [2022], quoting Matter of City of Watertown v State of N.Y. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:30 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 2:00 pm
Taylor, 47 M.J. 322, 325 (1997); United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 3:29 am
Further, if the work to be contracted out is not “exclusive unit work,” the impact of such action of the collective bargaining unit may constitute a mandatory subject to negotiations under the Taylor Law. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 8:27 am
Or, at a minimum, explain why it comes out 180 degrees differently than the opinion of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 7:19 am
HuffstetlerOn July 27, 2007, the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued Taylor v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 1:49 pm
United States, No. 07-5716; and Taylor v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 7:15 am
In United States v. [read post]