Search for: "Teague v. Teague"
Results 121 - 140
of 323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2008, 1:12 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 11:27 am
Aug. 25, 2010) (holding that Padilla did not create a new rule under Teague and was therefore retroactively applicable); United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:56 am
Despite the apparent clarity of this “rule,” the Court’s decision in Teague v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:22 pm
The state’s highest court turned him down again, having decided in earlier cases that it would apply the Teague v. [read post]
21 Jun 2005, 6:27 pm
Honestly, it's hard to see how Booker announced any "new right" at all (although many circuits have more or less said it did, for purposes of analyzing retroactivity under Teague v Lane, a related but not necessarily identical question, even in the cockamamie sense that the expression "new rule" is used for Teague v Lane purposes); what was *new* in Booker was the *remedy* not the "right" or the "rule," IMHO. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:38 pm
Under Teague v. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 10:36 am
Roberts, Jr., dropped a fascinating hint that the breadth of Congress' revision of federal habeas rules in 1996 might play a major role in determining the fate of one of the Court's most important precedents in the field: Teague v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 6:44 am
Teague, 2010 U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 3:35 pm
" Teague, 489 U.S. at 301. [read post]
17 May 2021, 7:53 am
14 Oct 2011, 8:36 am
Under this long-accepted “retroactivity” doctrine (endorsed by the Court in Teague v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 4:31 am
The Full Court’s judgments are Commissioner of Patents v Ono Pharmaceutical Co. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
A line of cases beginning with Teague v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 9:41 am
Rhoades v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 8:07 am
” The Court noted that in Teague v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 8:37 am
State v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 6:41 pm
Oregon v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:50 pm
And prior to Teague, in DeStefano v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:24 pm
The fundamental spirit of Teague v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
Gorsuch explains: Under Teague v. [read post]
