Search for: "Texas v. EEOC"
Results 121 - 140
of 466
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2019, 5:07 am
In the first case, Fort Bend County, Texas v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 9:46 am
Boca Raton and Burlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 7:31 am
Thomas v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 7:31 am
Thomas v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 9:01 am
Chatha filed a charge of discrimination with the EEOC and Texas Workforce Commission alleging race and nationality-based pay discrimination. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 6:13 am
In Waffle House v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:54 pm
The defense was first solidified by the Supreme Court of Texas in in its 1996 Continental Coffee Prod. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 7:00 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 4:10 am
Texas, (2003) (dissenting opinion)Obergefell v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 8:00 pm
EEOC v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 8:00 pm
EEOC v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 10:25 am
For more, read: The Police And Your Phone: Invasion Of Privacy By Police; Texas Police Can Get Your Phone Records From Phone Company Without A Warrant: Ford v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 6:37 am
The US Supreme Court ruled unanimously Monday in Fort Bend County, Texas v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 7:27 am
The case is Bridges v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:24 am
On June 3, 2019, the United States Supreme Court released an important decision in the case Fort Bend County, Texas v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 3:07 pm
--Saenz v Harlingen Medical Ctr, LP, (5th Circuit): Held that a federal district court in Texas erred in applying the heightened requirements of a Fifth Circuit precedent to find that an employee must comply with a hospital’s internally created FMLA notice procedures. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 10:19 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 3:02 am
Importantly, the opinion casts doubt on the EEOC’s powers to act by guidance in many other areas as well [Federalist Society teleforum with Mark Chenoweth and Eileen O’Connor on Texas v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:55 am
Supreme Court is set to hear arguments in Young v. [read post]
