Search for: "Texas v. United States Department of Labor" Results 121 - 140 of 393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2015, 2:21 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Gotcher is an Investigator with the United States Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) in the Dallas Regional Office. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 7:12 am by assoulineberlowe
Judge Rodney Smith, the soon to be new federal judicial appointment by the President for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, denied Callado’s motion to dissolve the LPs, and Callado appealed. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
United States] Housing disparate impact theory, dodged by administration last time around, returns to Court [Bloomberg, Daniel Fisher; Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 12:42 pm
 The new Secretary of Labor can appoint a new set of ARB members at any time, but until she does, we will continue to suffer with decisions like these: In Carter v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 5:57 am by Joy Waltemath
Finding that the Department of Labor’s position in an FLSA enforcement action was not substantially justified, a federal district court in Texas awarded an employer attorneys’ fees under Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Citizens United recognized a First Amendment right for corporations and labor unions to participate through spending in electoral campaigns. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 7:35 am by Joy Waltemath
The Department of Labor also revamped the white collar exemptions from overtime pay. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
Constitution Daily reports that “[o]ne of the most-significant cases of the Supreme Court’s current term,” United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 10:49 am by Adam Kielich
United States Steel Corp., the Supreme Court addressed, in an unanimous opinion, the issue of whether a collective bargaining agreement covering union workers could exclude the covered workers from pay for certain types of donning and duffing time. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:58 am by Amy Howe
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and concludes that, if the Court “harbors doubts about whether the Vermont statute should give way, the right thing to do is to uphold the law—at least until the Labor Department reconsiders its view that the law is perfectly consistent with ERISA. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by Bryn Hines
” The Labor Department and U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 11:51 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division (DOL) June 27, 2014 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), which would amend the definition of spouse under the current Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA) regulations in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]