Search for: "The Florida Bar v. Fine"
Results 121 - 140
of 315
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Lee, No. 06-3438 A sentence for various counts of bank fraud and aggravated identity theft is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not abuse its discretion in running several of the aggravated identity theft counts consecutively to each other; and 2) all of defendant's other issues on appeal were barred by his plea agreement or outside the scope of a remand order, and thus were barred. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 2:47 am
NidekThe first of these was Perez v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:55 am
Taylor v Buchanan – does it violate the First Amendment to force Michigan lawyers to pay money to join their Bar Association? [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Lawsuit Against College for Part Refund of Fees for COVID-19 Shutdown May Go Forward
17 Mar 2021, 4:52 am
Although both are fine vehicles, [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 11:10 am
As a brief refresher, as previously discussed here, in May 2014, the Southern District of Florida addressed an issue that the Supreme Court specifically declined to address in Gabelli v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 3:52 pm
The Florida Bar re Advisory Opinion. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Inc. v. [read post]
Why Carefully Designed Public Vaccination Mandates Can—and Should—Withstand Constitutional Challenge
12 Aug 2021, 5:01 am
In 2015, for example, in Phillips v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:54 am
Dowd represents collectors and dealers of fine art and has litigated disputes involving authenticity, forgery, ownership and provenance. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:00 pm
See Foster v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 11:17 pm
This is a case you gotta read.GRICE v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 2:05 pm
No, Casey Anthony’s Zenaida Gonzalez is none other than a Zanny Bar otherwise known as Xanax! [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:43 am
Delebreau v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 11:19 am
” Quoting the Florida Supreme Court, the Iowa Court noted, "It is unreasonable to subject an owner to a 'reasonable care' test against someone who isn't supposed to be there and about whom he does not know. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 1:06 pm
Denard Stokeling was previously convicted under Florida’s robbery law, which defines force as “sufficient to overcome a victim’s resistance. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 1:28 am
Slip-N-Slide Records, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:08 am
Zoldan v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 7:46 am
The Supreme Court of Florida applied the canon in Palm Beach County Canvassing Board v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 1:57 pm
Aldrich v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 5:50 am
This is a high but not impossible bar to meet, as shown in United States v. [read post]
