Search for: "The Met Hotel, LLC"
Results 121 - 140
of 170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2024, 7:12 am
Sleepy’s LLC, No. 3:10-cv-01138 (D.N.J. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 5:52 am
., LLC, 2018 WL 4489653 (E.D. [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 11:06 am
., nametags, language pins, service awards, and other pins approved by Hotel management for special promotion or activities. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
Piester, LLC (11-CA-21531; 353 NLRB No. 33) Newberry, SC Sept. 30, 2008. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
Mitigated negative declaration on conversion of apartments to hotel upheld against claim of impact based on loss of rent-stabilized units; baseline did not include any such units. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
Signaling an opportunity for franchisors to defend the legitimacy of their business models and the resulting franchise relationship, especially through the now clearly applicable threshold providing services question, the SJC noted that “any analysis of whether the ABC test is met must be done on a case-by-case basis”, citing numerous cases where franchise relationships were found to satisfy the three prongs of the ICL. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
The discussion of the issue is interesting because the Court recognizes the problem of applying traditional standing principles to website testers who only intend to visit a hotel website, not to visit the hotel. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
Signaling an opportunity for franchisors to defend the legitimacy of their business models and the resulting franchise relationship, especially through the now clearly applicable threshold providing services question, the SJC noted that “any analysis of whether the ABC test is met must be done on a case-by-case basis”, citing numerous cases where franchise relationships were found to satisfy the three prongs of the ICL. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:49 pm
On Oct. 27, 2016, Cohen wired $130,000 from the Essential Consultants LLC account to Daniels’s lawyer. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
By Joy P. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 11:10 am
BackgroundIn 1989, developers proposed a project in the City of Los Angeles (“City”), consisting of office space, a hotel, retail facilities, and an optional cultural center. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm
BIRMINGHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF, Defendant, BIRMINGHAM, CITY OF, THE, Defendant-Appellee. 11th Circuit.Federal jurisdiction -- Torts -- Removal of state court action to federal court -- Timeliness -- Appellate court need not decide whether defendant's notice of removal was timely in instant case because any error in failing to remand case to state court on ground that notice of removal was untimely would be procedural error and would be insufficient to warrant vacating judgment and… [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
CASES & OTHER ENTERTAINMENT LAW NEWS Lawsuit Seeks to expose truth behind “Catfish” http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/lawsuit-seeks-expose-truth-catfish-55969 Catfish is ostensibly a documentary about a guy who falls in love with a woman he met online, but never in person. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 6:27 am
Harbor Suites LLC, 2022 WL 4234960, (9th Cir. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Take Payday Lenders and Arbitration as a Textbook Case: What is the Majority Position on Litigation Waiver and Who Got It Right? [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 3:44 pm
By Catherine DeBono Holmes, Esq. and Victor T. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
"When Chronimed later informed DiCello that it would not pay the added cash because Northland's earnings failed to reach the benchmark, DiCello sued, claiming that Chronimed owed the additional payment because the earnings target would have been met had Chronimed operated the business as the contract promised. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
. , LLC, 2024 Ala. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
In addition, the Council challenged the negative declaration for the hotel amendment, arguing the CEQA analysis failed to consider the impacts of future development that would be permitted by the ordinance. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
In addition, the Council challenged the negative declaration for the hotel amendment, arguing the CEQA analysis failed to consider the impacts of future development that would be permitted by the ordinance. [read post]
