Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Cool" Results 121 - 140 of 925
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2011, 12:26 am by Orin Kerr
He became a judge on the New York Court of Appeals, and he wrote at least one opinion that touched on it, People v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 4:53 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
The joy of being a copyright specialist is the amazing array of cool, beautiful, and profound things that make up the raw material of what we do. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 4:53 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
The joy of being a copyright specialist is the amazing array of cool, beautiful, and profound things that make up the raw material of what we do. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 3:47 pm by Kevin
LTB shows up at the end—it looks like axe-related Google searches turned up the Case Law Hall of Fame and its reference to People v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 12:28 pm
Here you go.The case comes out the way most people would expect. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:13 pm
Prompting an all-out assault by his way-too-cool classmates. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:41 pm by Betsy McKenzie
They welcome people to download this and use it to help their organizations to prepare for the switchover. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 7:51 am by SHG
See United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 2:06 pm by admin
  The fact that his blog got 200,000 visitors per month shows that people can relate to it. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 6:51 pm
I says to the people, why ain't this nigger put up at auction and sold? [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:49 am
While regular updater Alberto Bellan continues his well-earned holiday, IPKat blogmeister Jeremy again brings news of last week's substantive blogposts for the benefit of those very many people who have been holidaying or otherwise absent in the past week. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 7:52 am by Eugene Volokh
An interesting decision Wednesday by N.Y. trial court judge Thomas Marcelle (Albany County), Hines v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 2:30 pm
  A lot.I had this keen sense when I read the parts of the Court of Appeal's opinion when the court mentions Polsky's repeated statements that this was an "unusual" case and that he doesn't usually slam people as much as he did here and that this was really special. [read post]