Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Cunningham" Results 121 - 140 of 178
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2011, 5:29 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The rhetoric-reality gap is attributable in part to a dilemma the Court created for itself: its national policy favoring arbitration is constitutionally-suspect unless people assent, yet letting people make what contracts they wish would prevent implementing the national policy. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 7:51 am by Kali Borkoski
” At Concurring Opinions, Lawrence Cunningham discusses AT&T v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:15 pm by Brian Shiffrin
However, review of the constitutionality of New York's Persistent Felony Offender sentencing law is still being sought in the certiorari petition filed on March 10, 2011 in the direct appeal in People v Battles [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:39 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Of course, those "tired arguments" were eventually accepted by the Supreme Court in Apprendi v New Jersey (530 US 466 [2000]), Blakely v Washington (542 US 296 [2004]) and Cunningham v California (549 US 270 [2007]). [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 7:56 am by Josh Wright
A fun example for contracts class, to be paired with Judge Kimba Wood’s opinion in Leonard v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 5:29 am by SHG
Over at VC, Eugene Volokh posts about the Iowa Supreme Court's decision in State v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 6:21 am
A shudder went through the state, and the state supreme court in People v. [read post]