Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Parks"
Results 121 - 140
of 4,274
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2023, 12:35 pm
Reference: People v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:06 pm
The law would have prohibited people from carrying concealed guns in 26 places—including public parks, playgrounds, churches, and banks—regardless of whether the person has a permit to carry concealed weapons. [read post]
The Office of Legal Counsel Discloses Classified List of Opinions in Important Step for Transparency
21 Dec 2023, 9:02 am
The case that led to the production of these documents, Francis v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 7:40 pm
SB 2 limits public places where people with concealed carry permits may carry their handguns to defend themselves. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:09 pm
In the parking lot Card accused three of them of calling him a pedophile and said he would take care of it. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 12:20 pm
Park v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am
On 13 December 2023, there was a hearing of an application for strike out in the data protection case of Pacini v Dow Jones before HHJ Parkes KC. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:38 pm
Enacted in the wake of the July 4, 2022, shooting at an Independence Day parade in Highland Park, Illinois, that killed seven people and wounded 48, the ban applies to firearms that the law defines as “assault weapons”; it also applies to large-capacity magazines and some kinds of ammunition, although people who already own the items that would otherwise be prohibited can keep them by registering them with the police. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am
On the same day, Johnson J heard the trial in the case of Shafi v New Vision TV Limited and another QB-2021-00443.6 On 4 to 8 December 2023 HHJ Parkes KC heard the trial in the case of Wilson v Mendelsohn and others QB-2021-002673. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 7:45 am
The controlling court case for when waivers of liability are not enforceable is Aldoo v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 2:27 pm
From Kidd v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 1:34 pm
Under Terry v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:21 pm
The case is Parks v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 7:20 am
Let me explain why.Suppose that an ordinance permits people to reserve the fields of a public park for "games of football, baseball, softball, soccer, frisbee, or any other appropriate activity. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
In a judgement of 26 July 2022, Nicklin J held that the defamatory meaning was that the Claimant was a hypocrite who had screwed the country and set a poor moral example to young people ([2022] EWHC 2469 (QB)). [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 7:27 pm
See also: People v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:06 am
It was aimed at people who believed in God and when the oil mixture was combined with prayer it would work to protect against and cure COVID – and he believed in the truth of claims he made for the mixture [9]. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 8:29 am
Similarly, in Young v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:41 am
In particular, NAGR and Bevis point to the Supreme Court’s recent decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:23 pm
In Missouri v. [read post]