Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Reader"
Results 121 - 140
of 6,588
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2014, 2:12 pm
” Méndez v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
Vullo; I think many of our readers will find it interesting (my apologies for the delay in passing it along). [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 2:07 pm
And there at #3 is United States v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:44 am
That case is Douglas v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:41 am
And not have a good time during his residence there.The Court of Appeal's factual recitation follows a predictable pattern, but there were a couple of surprising statements in there.For example, after the first paragraph quoted above, which introduces 10-year old Alexis to the reader, Justice Lavin's opinion states: "By 1986, defendant and Alexis had started dating. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 8:02 am
Regular Slaw readers will recall that whenever we’ve talked about the outsourcing phenomenon, we’ve directed people to an extraordinary blog by our friend Ron Friedmann in DC. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 6:17 pm
In Mays v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 2:47 pm
(See McCollum v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 8:47 am
If such plans are enacted and withstand legal scrutiny, one of the key technologies that could be deployed to track people trying to cross state lines is automated license plate readers (ALPRs). [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:22 pm
v. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 4:03 am
This is because stories about particular individuals are simply more attractive to readers than stories about unidentified people. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:59 pm
Fundamentally, the headline leaves the reader with the impression that innocent people are held in jail. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 10:38 am
Here’s the beginning: Buchanan v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 12:18 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:07 am
In People v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 7:18 am
Doron Dorfman Braidwood v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 9:56 pm
With respect to the merits of defendant's contention that a Frye hearing was required, it is well settled that expert testimony concerning CSAAS is admissible to assist the jury in understanding the unusual conduct of victims of child sexual abuse provided that, as here, the testimony is general in nature and does "not attempt to impermissibly prove that the charged crimes occurred" (People v Carroll, 95 NY2d 375, 387; see People v Gillard, 7 AD3d… [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 9:37 am
Winder v. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 9:37 am
Winder v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 5:56 am
UPDATE: Blowing Cash in Vegas v. [read post]
